2/1 Non-Forcing
Ideas by Rob Forster, version 2The original Seismic 2/1 Non-Forcing methods over 1M seemed interesting but had difficulty with the many strong hand types included in the forcing NT response (which covered all non-fitting invitational or better hands, and constructive hands with doubleton support). For this reason and for simplicity most Seismic partnerships had chosen a 2/1 Game Forcing alternative. While this is certainly familiar and effective, I think with some improvements and modifications the advantages of 2/1 GF can be combined in part with those of 2/1 NF in the following system:
- 1M-2
natural 3+ suit, forcing 1 round but does not promise a rebid (~11+ points) - 1M-2
natural NF, usually 6+ suit (~4-10 points) - 1
-2
natural NF, usually 6+ suit (~4-10 points)
The 2/1 NF bids of 2
and 2
are similar to weak 2 bids, usually 6 cards although possibly only 5 with shortness in opener’s major.
For complex reasons, it seems right to single out a 2/1 bid in clubs as forcing, consequently stronger in values (at least invitational) than the other 2/1 NF bids. The 2/1 bid of 2
includes the following hand types:
- invitational hands with long (6+)
, could have a side suit. - all the normal 2/1 GF 2
hands, including balanced hands with 3-card M support - all GF two suiters with clubs (even if it’s the shorter suit, like 5
/4
) - balanced GF hands looking for 3NT declared by opener
The remaining GF hands start with 1NT forcing. Recall that the direct major suit raise structure for Seismic covers all hands with 4+ support. In addition, compressed strong jump shifts also cover many slam invitational single suiters. A direct 3NT raise includes balanced 33(43) raises with extra values (15-17). What GF hands are left?
- GF one suiters in
or
, either without slam interest or a good enough suit to make a compressed jump shift. - GF two suiters in
+
, either longer. - GF balanced with 3-card M support but short clubs (hence not suitable for a 2
bid) - GF balanced looking to declare 3NT
After a 1NT forcing bid and opener's rebid, weaker than GF responders make their typical rebid as in 2/1 GF methods: invitational hands will raise one of opener’s suit(s), bid 2NT, or bid their own good/long suit at the 3 level (only for
and
). All the new suit (3rd suit) rebids at the 2 level and 3
show various GF hands. Specifically,
| 1NT Forcing Auction | Game Forcing rebids by responder |
|---|---|
1M-1NT-2![]() |
2 , 2OM, 3![]() |
1M-1NT-2![]() |
2OM, 3![]() |
1 -1NT-2![]() |
2 , 3![]() |
1 -1NT-2![]() |
3![]() |
1 -1NT-2![]() |
3![]() |
| 1M-1NT-reverse or jump shift | anything besides pass or correcting to opener’s first suit |
Aside from the invitational rebids by responder of 3
, 3
, and 3M, higher bids can also show suitable GF hands. 3NT is a natural choice, as are splinters (above 3M) in support of the last bid suit.
One advantage of this structure is that when responder is GF with
and/or OM, opener is likely to have club length. This means his response to 1M-1NT forcing is more often 2
, allowing responder to establish a clear GF auction at a low level and with several choices to accurately describe his hand.
Responder’s GF rebids after 1NT forcing:
Here are some first guesses for what different GF responding hands should chose, when they get a choice of GF replies to opener’s rebid. Not listed is the obvious 3NT choice in all cases. Note that club or M shortness (2-) is likely for responder on these auctions.
| Auction | Bid | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
1 -1NT-2![]() |
2![]() |
natural 4+ ( or > ) |
2![]() |
natural 5+ primary hearts | |
3![]() |
3 and 2- , agrees ![]() |
|
1 -1NT-2![]() |
2 |
natural 4+ |
2 |
4 /5+ (other + hands start 1 ) |
|
3 |
3 and 2- , agrees |
|
1 -1NT-2![]() |
2![]() |
catchall ( ’s or fit) |
3![]() |
3 and 2- , agrees |
|
1 -1NT-2 |
2 |
5+ (could have 4 ) |
3![]() |
3 and 2- , agrees ![]() |
|
1 -1NT-2 |
2 |
5+ (could have 4 ) |
3![]() |
3 and 2- , agrees ![]() |
- (it might be worth cycling the bids that agree on M down in some/all cases? )
- (it’s possible we might try to allow a weak club bust to bid 1NT forcing and bail in 3
, but might be too specialized given it will have to have tolerance to pass/correct if opener rebids a major and 3
would become GF)
Opener’s rebids when responder has a single GF call
1 -1NT-2 -3![]() |
3![]() |
asks for clarification | |
3![]() |
6+ hearts | ||
3![]() |
agrees spades | ||
| 3NT | 5+ diamonds (could have 4 ) |
||
3![]() |
fragment 3![]() |
||
3![]() |
long spades 7+ | ||
| 3NT | stopper |
||
1 -1NT-2 -3![]() |
3![]() |
asks for clarification | |
3![]() |
4+ agrees hearts | ||
3![]() |
3+ agrees spades | ||
| 3NT | 6+ diamonds | ||
3 |
5/5+ | ||
3 |
6+/4 | ||
| 3NT | stopper |
||
- How does opener/responder show extra values in these sequences? maybe thru 3
ask?
Opener’s rebid after 1M-2
:
1 -2 -2![]() |
artificial, max values (auction now natural and GF) |
1 -2 -2![]() |
natural 4+, min NF (invitational hands can pass or bid 3 ) |
1 -2 -2![]() |
natural 4+, min NF (invitational hands can pass or bid 3 ) |
1M-2 -2M |
natural 6+, min NF (invitational hands can pass or bid 3 ) |
1M-2 -2NT |
4+ , 1- clubs, min NF (invitational hands can pass or bid 3 , 3 GF/NF?) |
1M-2 -3![]() |
2+ clubs, min NF (invitational hands pass) |
1M-2 -3X |
distributional maximum 6/5+ |
1M-2 -3M |
distributional maximum 7+ |
Observe this scheme of natural minimum responses for opener’s rebid (in
,
,
) should allow responder to find the best strain with 2 suited invitational club hands (i.e. 4
/6
after 1
, 4
/6
after 1
) by passing or pulling to 3
.
2/1 NF Continuations (Opener’s Rebid):
besides the obvious and recommended pass option, we have:
raises of responder’s suit...
| 1M-2X-3X | blocking weak raise, 3+ support |
| 1M-2X-2NT | sound raise, 3+ support, inviting game (3X rebid declines) |
| 1M-2X-3NT | To play, probably |
| 1M-2X-4X | ? To play if 4 , blocking otherwise? |
splinter raises of X with big fits and maximums starting with 3M+1, i.e. 1
-2
-3
or new suit bids at the 4 level by opener.
weak non-fitting actions...
| 1M-2X-2M | natural, good 6+ suit, typically no tolerance for responder’s suit |
1 -2 -2![]() |
natural, 5/5+, no tolerance for responder (pass/correct) |
strong non-fitting actions...
1 -2X-2![]() |
natural, very distributional maximum |
| 1M-2X-3Y | natural, very distributional maximum |
| 1M-2X-3M | natural, very long suit, maximum |
| 1M-2X-4M | natural I suppose |